courts-legal

UK Courts and Tribunals Judiciary — AI Guidance for Judicial Office Holders

Name: Calibrated Authority rating — UK Courts and Tribunals Judiciary — AI Guidance for Judicial Office Holders
Item: UK Courts and Tribunals Judiciary — AI Guidance for Judicial Office Holders — public generative-AI policy
Rating: 10
Author: Chris Huber Reitz

10/12Calibrated Authority

“Judicial office holders are personally responsible for material which is produced in their name.”— Artificial Intelligence (AI) — Guidance for Judicial Office Holders, 14 April 2025, §6 Take Responsibility · source ↗

Traceability & inspectability

Human authorship & accountability

Disclosure & labeling

Synthetic-identity / fabrication prohibition

Human validation in loop

Evidential-trust emphasis

Posture Balanced Boundary fit · fits Trust-logic Both-split

Source policy: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Refreshed-AI-Guidance-published-version.pdf

Machine record: /institutions/uk-judiciary.json

Cite this

Reitz, C.H. (2026). The Calibrated Authority Index — UK Courts and Tribunals Judiciary — AI Guidance for Judicial Office Holders. https://calibrated-authority.chrishuberreitz.com/institutions/uk-judiciary Quote: “Judicial office holders are personally responsible for material which is produced in their name.” Source: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Refreshed-AI-Guidance-published-version.pdf

Index Methodology Manifest JSON atom CC-BY-4.0 · v2026-09-08 · Chris Huber Reitz