Supreme People's Court of China — Opinions on Regulating and Strengthening the Applications of AI in the Judicial Fields (2022)
9/12Calibrated Authority
“AI shall not make judicial decision substituting for the judge in any case, disregarding technology advancement. The results from AI shall be for supplemental references only, for adjudication or judicial supervision and management.”— Opinions on Regulating and Strengthening the Applications of AI in the Judicial Fields, Art. 5 (Principle of Supporting Adjudication), promulgated 8 December 2022 — English translation from the PRC SPC website, reproduced by China Justice Observer · source ↗
D1
Traceability & inspectability
2
D2
Human authorship & accountability
2
D3
Disclosure & labeling
1
D4
Synthetic-identity / fabrication prohibition
0
D5
Human validation in loop
2
D6
Evidential-trust emphasis
2
Posture EnablingBoundary fit · fitsTrust-logic Both-split
Reitz, C.H. (2026). The Calibrated Authority Index — Supreme People's Court of China — Opinions on Regulating and Strengthening the Applications of AI in the Judicial Fields (2022). https://calibrated-authority.chrishuberreitz.com/institutions/spc-china Quote: “AI shall not make judicial decision substituting for the judge in any case, disregarding technology advancement. The results from AI shall be for supplemental references only, for adjudication or judicial supervision and management.” Source: https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/law/x/the-supreme-people-s-court-the-opinions-on-regulating-and-strengthening-the-applications-of-artificial-intelligence-in-the-judicial-field-20221208