{
  "$schema": "https://calibrated-authority.chrishuberreitz.com/schema.json",
  "dataset": "The Calibrated Authority Index",
  "version": "2026-09-08",
  "creator": "Chris Huber Reitz",
  "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
  "id": "ifab-var-protocol",
  "name": "IFAB — Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol, Laws of the Game",
  "segment": "sports-governing-body",
  "url": "https://www.theifab.com/laws/latest/video-assistant-referee-var-protocol/",
  "scores": {
    "D1": 2,
    "D2": 2,
    "D3": 2,
    "D4": 0,
    "D5": 2,
    "D6": 2
  },
  "ca": 10,
  "posture": "Balanced",
  "c2_fit": "fits",
  "c3": "Both-split",
  "twilight": false,
  "coded_date": "2026-08-23",
  "last_changed": null,
  "revision": 0,
  "quote": "The referee is the only person who can make the final decision; the VAR has the same status as the other match officials and can only assist the referee",
  "quote_label": "IFAB Laws of the Game, Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol, §4 Procedures — Original decision",
  "provenance": {
    "url": "https://www.theifab.com/laws/latest/video-assistant-referee-var-protocol/",
    "verify_status": "primary-live-2026-08-23",
    "note": "The cleanest verification-economics split in the corpus, written with no AI vocabulary whatsoever. IFAB sorts by how expensive the proof is: 'For factual decisions e.g. position of an offence or player (offside), point of contact (handball/foul), location (inside or outside the penalty area), ball out of play etc. a VAR-only review is usually appropriate' — remote machine-assisted adjudication suffices where the fact is cheap and objective — whereas 'For subjective decisions, e.g. intensity of a foul challenge, interference at offside, handball considerations, an on-field review (OFR) is appropriate' — the accountable human must go look himself where the proof is contested. Even the replay speed is calibrated to evidence type: slow motion 'should only be used for facts', normal speed 'for the intensity of an offence'. D3=2 on an unusual mechanism: the mandatory 'TV signal' and the earpiece signal that 'announces that the referee is receiving information' are real-time public labels that machine assistance is in play, and 'the referee must remain visible during the review process to ensure transparency'. D6=2: 'There is no time limit for the review process as accuracy is more important than speed.' D4=0 — no fabrication or synthetic-content concept exists here ('mistaken identity' is about players, not synthetic identity). c3=Both-split because one clause openly overrides the evidential rule with a legitimacy rationale: an on-field review may be used for a factual decision 'if it will help manage the players/match or sell the decision'. twilight=false — explicit continuity claim: 'The VAR protocol, as far as possible, conforms to the principles and philosophy of the Laws of the Game.'"
  },
  "jsonld": {
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Review",
    "@id": "https://calibrated-authority.chrishuberreitz.com/institutions/ifab-var-protocol",
    "url": "https://calibrated-authority.chrishuberreitz.com/institutions/ifab-var-protocol",
    "name": "Calibrated Authority rating — IFAB — Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol, Laws of the Game",
    "datePublished": "2026-08-23",
    "itemReviewed": {
      "@type": "CreativeWork",
      "name": "IFAB — Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol, Laws of the Game — public generative-AI policy",
      "url": "https://www.theifab.com/laws/latest/video-assistant-referee-var-protocol/",
      "text": "The referee is the only person who can make the final decision; the VAR has the same status as the other match officials and can only assist the referee",
      "abstract": "The referee is the only person who can make the final decision; the VAR has the same status as the other match officials and can only assist the referee",
      "alternateName": "IFAB Laws of the Game, Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol, §4 Procedures — Original decision"
    },
    "reviewRating": {
      "@type": "Rating",
      "ratingValue": 10,
      "bestRating": 12,
      "worstRating": 0,
      "ratingExplanation": "Composite Calibrated Authority score (sum of six 0-2 dimensions). Breakdown — D1 Traceability & inspectability: 2; D2 Human authorship & accountability: 2; D3 Disclosure & labeling: 2; D4 Synthetic-identity / fabrication prohibition: 0; D5 Human validation in loop: 2; D6 Evidential-trust emphasis: 2. Posture: Balanced. Verification-boundary fit: fits. Trust-logic: Both-split."
    },
    "author": {
      "@type": "Person",
      "name": "Chris Huber Reitz",
      "url": "https://chrishuberreitz.com",
      "sameAs": [
        "https://chrishuberreitz.com",
        "https://chrishuberreitz.com/frameworks/calibrated-authority",
        "https://www.linkedin.com/in/chrishuberreitz"
      ]
    },
    "publisher": {
      "@type": "Person",
      "name": "Chris Huber Reitz",
      "url": "https://chrishuberreitz.com"
    },
    "isPartOf": {
      "@type": "Dataset",
      "name": "The Calibrated Authority Index",
      "url": "https://calibrated-authority.chrishuberreitz.com",
      "version": "2026-09-08",
      "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
    },
    "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"
  }
}