professional-licensing

State Bar of California — Practical Guidance for Generative AI in the Practice of Law

Name: Calibrated Authority rating — State Bar of California — Practical Guidance for Generative AI in the Practice of Law
Item: State Bar of California — Practical Guidance for Generative AI in the Practice of Law — public generative-AI policy
Rating: 11
Author: Chris Huber Reitz

11/12Calibrated Authority

“Critically, any use of AI must not diminish or abdicate professional judgment. A lawyer remains fully responsible for any outputs and work product generated with the assistance of AI.”— State Bar of California COPRAC, Practical Guidance for the Use of Generative AI in the Practice of Law (2026 revision), Conclusion · source ↗

Traceability & inspectability

Human authorship & accountability

Disclosure & labeling

Synthetic-identity / fabrication prohibition

Human validation in loop

Evidential-trust emphasis

Posture Balanced Boundary fit · fits Trust-logic Both-split

Source policy: https://www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/ethics/Generative-AI-Practical-Guidance.pdf

Machine record: /institutions/calbar.json

Cite this

Reitz, C.H. (2026). The Calibrated Authority Index — State Bar of California — Practical Guidance for Generative AI in the Practice of Law. https://calibrated-authority.chrishuberreitz.com/institutions/calbar Quote: “Critically, any use of AI must not diminish or abdicate professional judgment. A lawyer remains fully responsible for any outputs and work product generated with the assistance of AI.” Source: https://www.calbar.ca.gov/Portals/0/documents/ethics/Generative-AI-Practical-Guidance.pdf

Index Methodology Manifest JSON atom CC-BY-4.0 · v2026-09-08 · Chris Huber Reitz